Diff for "FAQ/BinomialConfidence/2gpp" - CBU statistics Wiki
location: Diff for "FAQ/BinomialConfidence/2gpp"
Differences between revisions 5 and 6
Revision 5 as of 2010-08-26 15:28:28
Size: 1158
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Revision 6 as of 2010-08-26 15:49:57
Size: 1299
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
The classical Wald statistic which is used for constructing confidence intervals produces too narrow a confidence interval when the difference in proportions is close to zero or one (Newcombe (1998)). Newcombe, instead, suggests using a modification of Wilson's (1927) method based on a single proportion. Agresti & Kin (2005) suggest a modification of the Wald statistic and these are all included in this EXCEL spreadsheet. TO BE ADDED HERE! The classical Wald statistic which is used for constructing confidence intervals for proportions produces too narrow a confidence interval when the difference in proportions is close to zero or one (Newcombe (1998)). Newcombe, instead, suggests using a modification of Wilson's (1927) method based on a single proportion. Agresti & Kin (2005) also find Wilson's method produces good coverage and also suggest an improved confidence interval may be obtained by a simple modification of the Wald statistic. These are all included in this EXCEL [attachment:paired_pci.xls: spreadsheet.]

Confidence interval for paired binomial proportions

The classical Wald statistic which is used for constructing confidence intervals for proportions produces too narrow a confidence interval when the difference in proportions is close to zero or one (Newcombe (1998)). Newcombe, instead, suggests using a modification of Wilson's (1927) method based on a single proportion. Agresti & Kin (2005) also find Wilson's method produces good coverage and also suggest an improved confidence interval may be obtained by a simple modification of the Wald statistic. These are all included in this EXCEL [attachment:paired_pci.xls: spreadsheet.]

References

[attachment:agresti.pdf Agresti A and Min Y (2005) Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions.] Statistics in Medicine 24(5) 729-740.

Newcombe RG (1998) Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Statistics in Medicine 17 2635-2650.

Lee S & Lee S-C (2007) An improved confidence interval for the population proportion in a double sampling scheme subject to false-positive misclassification, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 36 275–284. (reference for agrestic-oull method used in above spreadsheet).

None: FAQ/BinomialConfidence/2gpp (last edited 2013-03-08 10:17:37 by localhost)