Diff for "FAQ/MANOVA/manrm" - CBU statistics Wiki
location: Diff for "FAQ/MANOVA/manrm"
Differences between revisions 17 and 19 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 17 as of 2011-01-20 14:23:24
Size: 3616
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Revision 19 as of 2011-01-20 14:26:09
Size: 3620
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 47: Line 47:
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Educational:Boston, USA. Pages 319 to 321 of chapter 8 computes multivariate F ratios based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above with an example comparing activities across occupational groups. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Educational:Boston, USA.
(
Pages 316 to 321 of chapter 8 computes multivariate F ratios based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above with an example comparing activities across occupational groups.)

Multivariate output explained in SPSS repeated measures

In SPSS using the GLM:repeated measures procedure a multivariate analysis of variance is also presented. This assumes that (1) more than one variable representing a particular factor or measure is recorded at (2) multiple time points hence this set up is sometimes called a doubly multivariate design.

Let's illustrate what is going on with a simple example.

Consider nine subjects who perform a task under each of three conditions. The scores are given in the table along with the differences, D1 and D2, of C1-C2 and C1-C3 respectively.

C1

C2

C3

D1

D2

2

1

2

1

0

1

2

1

-1

0

2

3

2

-1

0

3

2

3

1

0

2

3

4

-1

-2

1

4

5

-3

-4

3

5

3

-2

0

2

6

4

-4

-2

1

4

5

-3

-4

Now, the multivariate anova test of the overall mean difference tests if the vector (D1 mean, D2 mean) equals (0,0) using the 2 by 2 (D1, D2) covariance matrix consisting of the D1 and D2 variances and their covariance.

The univariate anova test, on the other hand, takes the score and fits a multiple regression with a series of indicator variables. The indicators for the first four subjects are coded in the table. Two of these indicators represent condition and eight represent subjects. The SS(condition), for example, in the Univariate repeated measures anova represents the unexplained variance in scores which is not explained by subject differences ie 31.037 - 19.407 = 11.63.

SCORE

INDC2

INDC3

INDS1

INDS2

INDS3

INDS4

INDS5

INDS6

INDS7

INDS8

2

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

It can be seen from this that only the multivariate procedure assumes there is a correlation of the change in score between conditions 1 and 2 with the change in score between conditions 1 and 3 across the subjects. Any discrepancy in results between univariate and multivariate results will be due to the presence of such a correlation. This indicates a violation of the [:FAQ/MANOVA/manrm/sphericity:sphericity assumption.]

Reference

Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Educational:Boston, USA. (Pages 316 to 321 of chapter 8 computes multivariate F ratios based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above with an example comparing activities across occupational groups.)

None: FAQ/MANOVA/manrm (last edited 2014-02-27 12:13:37 by PeterWatson)