|
Size: 3711
Comment:
|
Size: 3717
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 50: | Line 50: |
| (Pages 316 to 321 of chapter 8 illustrates the computation of a multivariate F ratio for an interaction involving a between subjects factor (occupational group) with a within subjects factor (activity) based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above.) | (Pages 316 to 321 of chapter 8 show the step-by-step computation of a multivariate F ratio for an interaction involving a between subjects factor (occupational group) with a within subjects factor (activity) based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above.) |
Multivariate output explained in SPSS repeated measures
In SPSS using the GLM:repeated measures procedure a multivariate analysis of variance is also presented.
Let's illustrate what is going on with a simple example.
Consider nine subjects who perform a task under each of three conditions. The scores are given in the table along with the differences, D1 and D2, of C1-C2 and C1-C3 respectively.
C1 |
C2 |
C3 |
D1 |
D2 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
-1 |
0 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
-1 |
-2 |
|
1 |
4 |
5 |
-3 |
-4 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
-2 |
0 |
|
2 |
6 |
4 |
-4 |
-2 |
|
1 |
4 |
5 |
-3 |
-4 |
|
Now, the multivariate anova test of the overall mean difference tests if the vector (D1 mean, D2 mean) equals (0,0) using the 2 by 2 (D1, D2) covariance matrix consisting of the D1 and D2 variances and their covariance.
The univariate anova test, on the other hand, takes the score and fits a multiple regression with a series of indicator variables. The indicators for the first four subjects are coded in the table. Two of these indicators represent condition and eight represent subjects. The SS(condition), for example, in the Univariate repeated measures anova represents the unexplained variance in scores which is not explained by subject differences ie 31.037 - 19.407 = 11.63.
SCORE |
INDC2 |
INDC3 |
INDS1 |
INDS2 |
INDS3 |
INDS4 |
INDS5 |
INDS6 |
INDS7 |
INDS8 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
It can be seen from this that only the multivariate procedure assumes there is a correlation of the change in score between conditions 1 and 2 with the change in score between conditions 1 and 3 across the subjects. Any discrepancy in results between univariate and multivariate results will be due to the presence of such a correlation. This indicates a violation of the [:FAQ/MANOVA/manrm/sphericity:sphericity assumption.]
Finally a piece of termionology: if 1) more than one variable representing a particular factor or measure is recorded at (2) multiple time points this set up is sometimes called a doubly multivariate design.
Reference
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Educational:Boston, USA. (Pages 316 to 321 of chapter 8 show the step-by-step computation of a multivariate F ratio for an interaction involving a between subjects factor (occupational group) with a within subjects factor (activity) based on matrices using differences of form D1 and D2 above.)