Diff for "FAQ/TukeyKramer" - CBU statistics Wiki
location: Diff for "FAQ/TukeyKramer"
Differences between revisions 1 and 13 (spanning 12 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2008-10-13 14:59:47
Size: 539
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2008-12-15 10:12:59
Size: 1390
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
 == Comparing all pairwise comparisons in an anova assuning equality of group variances == = Comparing all pairwise comparisons in an anova assuning equality of group variances =
Line 3: Line 3:
Ramsey PH and Ramsey PP (2008) recommend using the Tukey-Kramer procedure to compare all possible group means assuming homogeneity of group variances. It is found to give the best any-pair power if the overall F test is not signifcant. This procedure is computed for upto 10 means using this [attachment:mcneq.xls spreadsheet.] It may also be computed using the 'mc' or 'mcneq' procedures found by typing the procedural name at a Unix prompt. Ramsey PH and Ramsey PP (2008) recommend using the Tukey-Kramer procedure to compare all possible group means ''assuming homogeneity'' of group variances. It is found to give the best any-pair power if the overall F test is ''not significant''. This procedure is computed for upto 10 means using this [attachment:mcneq+hf.xls spreadsheet.] It may also be computed using the ''mc'' or ''mcneq'' procedures found by typing ''mc'' and ''mcneq'' at a UNIX prompt. Ramsey and Ramsey (2008) further recommend using the more conservative Hayter-Fisher modification of the Tukey-Kramer procedure for maximizing any-pair power in the presence of a ''significant'' overall F value. This is also computed in the spreadsheet.

The Games-Howell approach is recommended for all pairwise comparisons when there are ''heterogeneous'' group variances. The Games-Howell approach may be computed in SPSS using the ''GLM:univariate'' procedure or by using this [attachment:gamesh.xls spreadsheet.]

A flow chart detailing post-hoc tests for between subject designs is [attachment:flow.pdf here.]

__Reference__

Ramsey PH and Ramsey PP (2008) Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case. ''British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology'' '''61(1)''' 115-131.

Comparing all pairwise comparisons in an anova assuning equality of group variances

Ramsey PH and Ramsey PP (2008) recommend using the Tukey-Kramer procedure to compare all possible group means assuming homogeneity of group variances. It is found to give the best any-pair power if the overall F test is not significant. This procedure is computed for upto 10 means using this [attachment:mcneq+hf.xls spreadsheet.] It may also be computed using the mc or mcneq procedures found by typing mc and mcneq at a UNIX prompt. Ramsey and Ramsey (2008) further recommend using the more conservative Hayter-Fisher modification of the Tukey-Kramer procedure for maximizing any-pair power in the presence of a significant overall F value. This is also computed in the spreadsheet.

The Games-Howell approach is recommended for all pairwise comparisons when there are heterogeneous group variances. The Games-Howell approach may be computed in SPSS using the GLM:univariate procedure or by using this [attachment:gamesh.xls spreadsheet.]

A flow chart detailing post-hoc tests for between subject designs is [attachment:flow.pdf here.]

Reference

Ramsey PH and Ramsey PP (2008) Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 61(1) 115-131.

None: FAQ/TukeyKramer (last edited 2017-05-10 08:47:32 by PeterWatson)